Imagine the scene: you're sitting in the cinema, with a mate or two.
You chomp on popcorn and slurp at your drink.
You hope beyond hope that the annoying kids behind you will settle down after the trailers (they won't: they will kick your chair, climb over the seats, and talk loudly, but you can hope.)
The film starts. (The kids don't really settle down. Dammit.)
It's a superhero movie - a big one. The big one of the year (although, there are at least four films vying for that title.)
Before long, you're completely engrossed in the story. The bad guys are being bad. The good guys are being good. Stuff blows up. People get hurt, mainly by the good guys.
A dude approaches our hero. They've been fighting, side by side (in a battle which must've cost millions to film.)
The new dude got a bit banged-up in the fight, and title-hero is feeling moodily guilty.
"Hey man," new dude says. "It wasn't your fault."
"It was," title-hero replies, "but thanks..." he sighs heavily.
(The kids behind you are throwing popcorn. You really wish their parents would stop pretending not to notice.)
"Don't," new dude whispers... and plants a kiss on title-hero's lips.
But the world doesn't end. The kids' parents don't scream. Everyone carries on with their lives.
Could this happen? I mean, really? Could this be a reality some day? (And hopefully someday soon.) Or are the studios too terrified to let one of their main properties be gay?
Because it really gets to something when we're more willing to shoe-horn in a generic blonde female (who deserves to have more character development than she's given, might I add, *cough* Civil War *cough*) than to let a leading man kiss another man in a blockbuster.
As things stand? I really can't see any of the money-making superheroes being permitted to be LGBTQ+ - on page or on screen.
But the amount of fanfiction (yes, I know, I rabbit on about fanfiction a lot, but I have an actual point here, promise) which shows main characters in same-sex relationships shows that there is an interest in change.
You can dismiss this as the wish of a minority of fans if you want - but the amount of fanfiction readers and writers that are out there writing and reading about same-sex relationships and LGBTQ+ issues runs into the millions.
Are the big studios really ready to dismiss the voices of change coming out of fandom? Are the publishers?
Big changes usually start with the comics.
Yes, we now have LGBTQ+ comic-book characters: Mystique, Deadpool, Iceman, Daken, Hulkling, Wiccan, Northstar, Miss America, Loki...
But even Mystique, Deadpool, Loki, and Iceman, are portrayed as straight on film (although there is the possibility of change for Deadpool).
And the others? Great characters, but not ones that even the casual fans will know, let alone the general public.
The lists of LGBT superheroes and villains (although a lot of these 'villains' could be considered anti-heroes,) on Wikipedia are woefully small. Even worse are their scarcity of notable figures.
Would it really be such a shock to have Captain America kiss Bucky Barnes?
...on page or on screen?
Maybe it would be. I'm sure the haters would come out in droves. There are some countries which would probably ban the film.
There would be uproar in several quarters. Free publicity, at the very least. (Moi? Cynical? Pshaw!)
But aren't superheroes supposed to be brave? Aren't they supposed to challenge injustices and support people being themselves (unless yourself wants to take over the world... I suppose.)
So, superheroes, it's time to be brave, and its time to be bold.
It doesn't have to be Cap and Bucky - they're just an example.
But it has to be one of the money-makers, one of the heroes with a following of their own.
It has to be someone on the level of Iron Man, Wolverine, Spider-Man, Thor, et. al. (ooh, look at me with my fancy Latin abbreviations,) or it'll just be the publishers and studios hedging their bets with a less valuable property. That's a cop-out.
Let it be big, and let it be soon. Superheroes are supposed to lead the way forward. And this is the way forward - a brave and bold strike for equality, love, and a shared humanity.
Let's be brave. Let's be bold. Let's change the world.
Like this post? Try this:
Dora Reads is the book blog of a Bookish Rebel, supporting the Diversity Movement, bringing you Queer views and mental health advocacy, slipping in a lot of non-bookish content, and spreading reading to the goddamn world! :) (All posts may contain Amazon links, which are affiliate, unless marked otherwise. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. USA ONLY - please do not make UK purchases with my links)
Wednesday, 11 May 2016
Monday, 9 May 2016
How to Deal With Book Amnesia
'Have I read this before? Maybe. Seems familiar... argh, a generic title! A well-known author! A vague blurb! HAVE I READ THIS OR HAVEN'T I?!'
'Ooh, I've read that series! Which book am I on? Ummm... I wanna say the fourth? Maybe the fifth? The third? The one where thingummy comes into to it...'
'Yeah, I've read that book. I wanna say vampires? Werewolves? Oh, of course, assassins - no, I have read it. I must have... I've marked it as 'read' and rated it on Goodreads.'
'No, I don't think I've read that... I reviewed it?!?! Man, I really don't remember this at all.'
Does any of this seem familiar? If so, my fellow book-amnesiacs, you are not alone, much as I wish you were.
The problem is, I read so much that the boundary-lines tend to become a bit blurred. I mix up details, titles, series, or just plain can't remember the damned thing.
Plus, I've asked everyone I know, and no-one can remember what happens at the end of Oliver Twist. No-one. On this planet. I'm certain of this.
After (spoiler) Nancy goes to the big wh*re-house in the sky, everyone just has white-noise about the rest of the details.
But help, my dear nerdlets, is at hand! Here are someslightly-sarcastic tips on dealing with book amnesia!
Like this post? Try these:
'Ooh, I've read that series! Which book am I on? Ummm... I wanna say the fourth? Maybe the fifth? The third? The one where thingummy comes into to it...'
'Yeah, I've read that book. I wanna say vampires? Werewolves? Oh, of course, assassins - no, I have read it. I must have... I've marked it as 'read' and rated it on Goodreads.'
'No, I don't think I've read that... I reviewed it?!?! Man, I really don't remember this at all.'
Does any of this seem familiar? If so, my fellow book-amnesiacs, you are not alone, much as I wish you were.
The problem is, I read so much that the boundary-lines tend to become a bit blurred. I mix up details, titles, series, or just plain can't remember the damned thing.
Plus, I've asked everyone I know, and no-one can remember what happens at the end of Oliver Twist. No-one. On this planet. I'm certain of this.
After (spoiler) Nancy goes to the big wh*re-house in the sky, everyone just has white-noise about the rest of the details.
But help, my dear nerdlets, is at hand! Here are some
- Look back over your Goodreads - you might have marked the book or series as 'read' or 'to-read,' (or if you have a blog, you might have actually reviewed it... oops.) Checking the details may spring-board your memory. Or not. Whatever.
- Ask someone else. My mother asks me whether she's read books from the library before. I tend to remember them better than she does. I think this is possibly because she's not paying attention.
- Find a list of the series online and work out what happens when and where. You'll then be able to figure out which books you've read. Probably. Being honest, this doesn't always work. I can never remember which Kathy Reichs books I've read, no matter how much I love them or how many times I read the blurbs.
- Just re-read it. Sometimes it's easier. If you remember it half-way through, you can always stop.
- Look at different versions of the cover - maybe you can't remember because it looked different?!?! Right?!?!
- Ban authors from naming books generic titles like 'Blood' or formulaic titles like 'City of...' - it makes it much harder to tell the damned things apart, and really, you're authors - come up with a different title before I mix your book up with the other guy's. Please.
- Ban authors from naming books different titles in different same-language countries. Dudes, I get if it if it's a translation, but giving a book two English titles? Just confusing.
- Also ban them from releasing a new edition of the same book with a different title. (What did I ever do to you?)
- Look up the ending to Oliver Twist. Re-write it a hundred times. Stick it on post-it notes around the house. And then forget it anyway. BECAUSE NO-ONE KNOWS WHAT HAPPENS AT THE END OF OLIVER TWIST.
Like this post? Try these:
Sunday, 8 May 2016
Nerd Church - Use Your Vote, Raise Your Voice
We had some elections here this week.
One thing became abundantly clear to me - not enough of us vote.
Because, while the turnout was what is considered 'good,' it was still under 50% of voters. If less than half of the people are speaking - how do you know what the majority wants?
What really disgusted me though was that UKIP won 7 assembly seats.
Maybe that doesn't sound like that much to you. We only have 60 seats in the Welsh Assembly. That means that UKIP holds over 10% of seats. They have never held an Assembly seat before.
As an explanation to you non-British folks: UKIP are a bunch of bigoted idiots who think Britain should leave the European Union because... foreigners.
And apparently foreigners are bad. That is the extent of their logic.
They claim to not be racist, homophobic, sexist, and/or bigoted. I don't believe them.
Their leader is Nigel Farage - think Donald Trump levels of douche-bag-ish-ness, with more tea and visits to the pub, and the likeness of a toad. Oh, and more cunning.
Part of me really doesn't understand how UKIP can be voted in in Wales - their values are so very different to ours, that it just doesn't seem like a good fit.
In fact, to me it seems an affront to the blood of the land that these idiots dare to represent it.
I could understand Welsh people voting Conservative more easily than I can understand them voting UKIP (and every inch of my red socialist blood shudders at the thought of voting Conservative - but at least that's a choice I can understand people making.)
UKIP stand for intolerance. They stand for non-inclusiveness. They blame litter on immigrants. That is not my Wales.
But if less than half of voters actually vote, then how can we stop the far-right?
Truth is, we can't. Because the far-right is excessively good at frog-marching people down to the polling station.
So we need to vote. Everyone, everywhere - not just here in Wales, or here in the UK.
Speak up, and make sure your voice is heard.
Otherwise, it'll be hello Prime Minister Farage and President Trump - and we'll end up sending our children to fight in the Hunger Games.
Actually, the Hunger Games will probably be preferable to what those two rich prats have in store...
(Dear USA: I must point out that most of the rest of the world would very much prefer if Trump did not become President. Respectfully yours, Everyone.)
Nerd Church is a weekly post where Irant about discuss various issues. Feel free to continue the discussion, but as always, please link back here, and be respectful :)
Like this post? Try these:
One thing became abundantly clear to me - not enough of us vote.
Because, while the turnout was what is considered 'good,' it was still under 50% of voters. If less than half of the people are speaking - how do you know what the majority wants?
What really disgusted me though was that UKIP won 7 assembly seats.
Maybe that doesn't sound like that much to you. We only have 60 seats in the Welsh Assembly. That means that UKIP holds over 10% of seats. They have never held an Assembly seat before.
As an explanation to you non-British folks: UKIP are a bunch of bigoted idiots who think Britain should leave the European Union because... foreigners.
And apparently foreigners are bad. That is the extent of their logic.
They claim to not be racist, homophobic, sexist, and/or bigoted. I don't believe them.
Their leader is Nigel Farage - think Donald Trump levels of douche-bag-ish-ness, with more tea and visits to the pub, and the likeness of a toad. Oh, and more cunning.
Part of me really doesn't understand how UKIP can be voted in in Wales - their values are so very different to ours, that it just doesn't seem like a good fit.
In fact, to me it seems an affront to the blood of the land that these idiots dare to represent it.
I could understand Welsh people voting Conservative more easily than I can understand them voting UKIP (and every inch of my red socialist blood shudders at the thought of voting Conservative - but at least that's a choice I can understand people making.)
UKIP stand for intolerance. They stand for non-inclusiveness. They blame litter on immigrants. That is not my Wales.
But if less than half of voters actually vote, then how can we stop the far-right?
Truth is, we can't. Because the far-right is excessively good at frog-marching people down to the polling station.
So we need to vote. Everyone, everywhere - not just here in Wales, or here in the UK.
Speak up, and make sure your voice is heard.
Otherwise, it'll be hello Prime Minister Farage and President Trump - and we'll end up sending our children to fight in the Hunger Games.
Actually, the Hunger Games will probably be preferable to what those two rich prats have in store...
(Dear USA: I must point out that most of the rest of the world would very much prefer if Trump did not become President. Respectfully yours, Everyone.)
Nerd Church is a weekly post where I
Like this post? Try these:
Saturday, 7 May 2016
Book Nerd on a Mission
One of my New Year's resolutions was that I want to spread reading to the world.
You heard me - THE EVER-LOVING WORLD
I want to encourage everyone to read - not just the already bookish (although I want you guys to keep reading, ofc; but at this point, I don't think anyone could stop you anyway.)
But how do I do that?
Well, for a start I blog about reading and books almost every day. (By the way, don't panic if I don't post every now and then - I need a day off sometimes!)
But I'm not naïve, I know that the vast majority of people who read a blog called 'Diary of a Reading Addict' are going to have some sort of interest in reading to begin with. It's a bit of a no-brainer.
I reckon I'm going some way, though, to preaching to the non-converted by sharing my blog-posts to Twitter with non-book-specific blogging hashtags, and RT accounts. Of course I always follow the rules of the hashtag or the RT, because that way people don't get pi*sy at you ;)
So yes, I think I gather a very few non/occasional-readers slowly but surely into the fold that way. That's something at least. We'll call it progress ;)
BUT I'M ON A MISSION
Which means that I can't rest on my little proverbial laurels, I have to be doing stuff - encouraging reading whenever and wherever I can.
The best way to lead is by example.
As the peculiar little species that we are, we love to copy each other in an attempt to fit in.
A lot of this is a subconscious following of the herd (not the worst thing in the world so long as you're not following others right off of a cliff, and don't think that you always have to follow others. You don't.)
So, for something to be deemed to be cool and/or worth-while, a lot of people have to think that it's cool and/or worth-while. (I know - it doesn't make any sense, does it? But that's how human society has worked for aeons. We may as well use it to the advantage of doing something good.)
So I have a cunning plan...
I'm going to read in public. Whenever I can. Wherever I can. I'm going to be seen reading beyond the confines of my own home.
Sure, I already read while I'm waiting for doctors' appointments, but the very fact that I'm usually the only one in the waiting room with a book in my hands gives me a clue that I'm on to something here.
I'm going to make sure that, at least once a week, I'm spotted with an open book in my hands somewhere out in the wilds of the world (OK... so it'll probably be on a bench of the local shopping centre... same thing, right?)
But what difference will that make? I hear you cry! (I can't really hear you... that would be weird.)
Well, ye blog-readers of little faith and happenstance (OK, there may've been coffee, but can you blame me?) if people see me reading then, somewhere deep in their complex brains, they will think about it.
They might be attracted by the shiny cover. They might wonder what my book is about. They might look it up on the Internet.
Or it might spark a million other thoughts related to that book. They might end up talking to a friend about it. They might end up reading that book.
Plus it will make reading the thing that people do.
Everyone checks their phones in public. Lots of people play music. Lots of people faff about on their laptop, iPads, whatever...
Some people read in public, it's true. But less. It's not as normal to see someone reading in public as it is for people to be doing all of these other things. And why the hell not?! Reading is awesome.
I'm gonna need help, guys.
Join me in my crusade to get every person in this world into the magical and wonderful world of reading!
GET OUT THERE AND READ!
Go out and read on a bench. In a café. In a coffee shop. At the dentist's.
Reading a paperback or hardback is more likely to have the desired effect because people can see that it's a book as opposed to a tablet, but if there're no physical books to hand - then read e-books.
If you decide to take my advice and go off into the wilds, book in hand, then I'd love to see a pic - if you Tweet me one (my Twitter is @CeeArrBookNerd) then I'll re-tweet (...or put it in a blogpost, or maybe both... haven't really decided yet. I suppose it depends on whether anyone actually sends a pic.)
Also, if anyone else has any other ideas on how I can spread reading like an ever-loving plague across the face of the earth? I'd be much obliged. ;)
You heard me - THE EVER-LOVING WORLD
I want to encourage everyone to read - not just the already bookish (although I want you guys to keep reading, ofc; but at this point, I don't think anyone could stop you anyway.)
But how do I do that?
Well, for a start I blog about reading and books almost every day. (By the way, don't panic if I don't post every now and then - I need a day off sometimes!)
But I'm not naïve, I know that the vast majority of people who read a blog called 'Diary of a Reading Addict' are going to have some sort of interest in reading to begin with. It's a bit of a no-brainer.
I reckon I'm going some way, though, to preaching to the non-converted by sharing my blog-posts to Twitter with non-book-specific blogging hashtags, and RT accounts. Of course I always follow the rules of the hashtag or the RT, because that way people don't get pi*sy at you ;)
So yes, I think I gather a very few non/occasional-readers slowly but surely into the fold that way. That's something at least. We'll call it progress ;)
BUT I'M ON A MISSION
Which means that I can't rest on my little proverbial laurels, I have to be doing stuff - encouraging reading whenever and wherever I can.
The best way to lead is by example.
As the peculiar little species that we are, we love to copy each other in an attempt to fit in.
A lot of this is a subconscious following of the herd (not the worst thing in the world so long as you're not following others right off of a cliff, and don't think that you always have to follow others. You don't.)
So, for something to be deemed to be cool and/or worth-while, a lot of people have to think that it's cool and/or worth-while. (I know - it doesn't make any sense, does it? But that's how human society has worked for aeons. We may as well use it to the advantage of doing something good.)
So I have a cunning plan...
I'm going to read in public. Whenever I can. Wherever I can. I'm going to be seen reading beyond the confines of my own home.
Sure, I already read while I'm waiting for doctors' appointments, but the very fact that I'm usually the only one in the waiting room with a book in my hands gives me a clue that I'm on to something here.
I'm going to make sure that, at least once a week, I'm spotted with an open book in my hands somewhere out in the wilds of the world (OK... so it'll probably be on a bench of the local shopping centre... same thing, right?)
But what difference will that make? I hear you cry! (I can't really hear you... that would be weird.)
Well, ye blog-readers of little faith and happenstance (OK, there may've been coffee, but can you blame me?) if people see me reading then, somewhere deep in their complex brains, they will think about it.
They might be attracted by the shiny cover. They might wonder what my book is about. They might look it up on the Internet.
Or it might spark a million other thoughts related to that book. They might end up talking to a friend about it. They might end up reading that book.
Plus it will make reading the thing that people do.
Everyone checks their phones in public. Lots of people play music. Lots of people faff about on their laptop, iPads, whatever...
Some people read in public, it's true. But less. It's not as normal to see someone reading in public as it is for people to be doing all of these other things. And why the hell not?! Reading is awesome.
I'm gonna need help, guys.
Join me in my crusade to get every person in this world into the magical and wonderful world of reading!
GET OUT THERE AND READ!
Go out and read on a bench. In a café. In a coffee shop. At the dentist's.
Reading a paperback or hardback is more likely to have the desired effect because people can see that it's a book as opposed to a tablet, but if there're no physical books to hand - then read e-books.
If you decide to take my advice and go off into the wilds, book in hand, then I'd love to see a pic - if you Tweet me one (my Twitter is @CeeArrBookNerd) then I'll re-tweet (...or put it in a blogpost, or maybe both... haven't really decided yet. I suppose it depends on whether anyone actually sends a pic.)
Also, if anyone else has any other ideas on how I can spread reading like an ever-loving plague across the face of the earth? I'd be much obliged. ;)
Like this post? Try these:
Friday, 6 May 2016
Friday Fics Fix! - In a Club With You In 1973
OK! Let's talk DC's Legends of Tomorrow! The show cobbled together from odd pieces of other shows that somehow works!
Though the fandom is young, and the potential plot-holes many, there is Legends fanfiction out there already, just waiting to be discovered!
(Yes, I have had coffee. No, we're not going to make a big deal about it.)
Of course, Dr Who comparisons abound. Not least because the leader of this motley gang of spin-off characters is a 'Time Master,' played by Arthur Darvill (more commonly known as 'y'know, Rory off of Dr Who?')
Turns out the character of Rip Hunter, he of the Time Master fame, pre-dates Dr Who.
I know, this requires some serious nerdish thought - is Legends being accused of being a rip-off of a show that ripped it off over 50 years ago?! Mind = Blown!
Also, Rip Hunter rocks quite a lot. Captain Rip Hunter, that is.
This week's fanfiction, my dear nerdlets, then, is:
Though the fandom is young, and the potential plot-holes many, there is Legends fanfiction out there already, just waiting to be discovered!
(Yes, I have had coffee. No, we're not going to make a big deal about it.)
Of course, Dr Who comparisons abound. Not least because the leader of this motley gang of spin-off characters is a 'Time Master,' played by Arthur Darvill (more commonly known as 'y'know, Rory off of Dr Who?')
Turns out the character of Rip Hunter, he of the Time Master fame, pre-dates Dr Who.
I know, this requires some serious nerdish thought - is Legends being accused of being a rip-off of a show that ripped it off over 50 years ago?! Mind = Blown!
Also, Rip Hunter rocks quite a lot. Captain Rip Hunter, that is.
But anyway, this week's fanfiction takes the whole Dr Who comparisons thing, and runs the hell away with it, by making a 'crack' origin story for Legends.
(Fangirling note: 'Crack' fanfiction is fanfiction that is so very random and bizarre, that the author must've been on some sort of mind-altering substances when they came up with it.
Like, even more than normal fanfiction.)
Basically, in this version, Rip is Rory. Which would kind of give the whole obsession with rescuing his wife thing a whole new meaning.
This week's fanfiction, my dear nerdlets, then, is:
Legends of Tomorrow: A Crack Origin Story by eyecandy
BUT THAT'S NOT ALL! (Cue cheesy salesman's grin.)
Because I feel it deserves an honourable mention for the White Canary taking a knife into the shower, and because I spoil you, I will also refer you to:
Legends Family: Early Mornings by sansasnarks
Don't say I never do anything for you ;)
Also - that is yet another week without any explicit sex! I DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS POSSIBLE!!!!!
Like this post? Try these:
Also - that is yet another week without any explicit sex! I DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS POSSIBLE!!!!!
Like this post? Try these:
Thursday, 5 May 2016
Comics Wrap Up - Run Neon Tiger
Film Trailers
A couple of X-Men: Apocalypse teasers/TV ads/whatever you want to call them for you - because clearly nerd-dom wasn't riled up enough about superheroes this month already ;)
Graphic Novels
This week, I read Klaw: The First Cycle (UK - US) - a pretty unique take on shape-shifters and the Chinese zodiac, with some superhero-origin-story action creeping in as well.
It was pretty cool - not earth-shattering, but interesting and readable.
A full review will be up in a month or so (I know, I'm cruel, making you wait :P .)
Other Stuff
I read this short review of Gotham Academy Vol 2 (UK - US) from Magdalena @ A Bookish Swede, which reminded me that I need to get my hands on this series at some point.
Like This Post? Try These:
A couple of X-Men: Apocalypse teasers/TV ads/whatever you want to call them for you - because clearly nerd-dom wasn't riled up enough about superheroes this month already ;)
Graphic Novels
This week, I read Klaw: The First Cycle (UK - US) - a pretty unique take on shape-shifters and the Chinese zodiac, with some superhero-origin-story action creeping in as well.
It was pretty cool - not earth-shattering, but interesting and readable.
A full review will be up in a month or so (I know, I'm cruel, making you wait :P .)
Other Stuff
I read this short review of Gotham Academy Vol 2 (UK - US) from Magdalena @ A Bookish Swede, which reminded me that I need to get my hands on this series at some point.
Like This Post? Try These:
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
Review! (Yay!) - alt.sherlock.holmes
Author:
Gini Koch, Jamie Wyman, Glen Mehn
Genre:
Anthology, Novellas/Short Stories, Crime, Contemporary*, Historical Fiction*, LGBTQ+*, M/M* (*one or more stories.)
Amazon:
UK - USA
Individual Novellas:
The Case of the Tattoed Bride (UK - US)
A Study in Starlets (UK - US)
The Power of Media (UK - US)
Individual Novellas:
The Case of the Tattoed Bride (UK - US)
A Study in Starlets (UK - US)
The Power of Media (UK - US)
A few starting notes:
I
received a free digital review copy of this book via NetGalley from the publishers Abaddon, an imprint of Rebellion.
NetGalley provides review copies from publishers in exchange for fair
and honest reviews.
I'm a fan of pretty much anything Sherlock-Holmes-related, so when I got the chance to read this collection of alternative takes on Holmes & Watson, I was there.
Premise:
Sanford 'Crash' Haus (this story's version of Sherlock,) is the owner of a travelling carnival in 1930s dustbowl-America.
Fate throws him together with Jim Walker (John Watson,) a black amputee war-veteran, who also happens to be one hell of a doctor.

All the Single Ladies (and) A Study in Starlets by Gini Koch
Murder and reality shows bring together Dr John Watson with Ms Sherlock Holmes, a consulting detective with the LAPD.
Will Southern California ever be the same?

Half There/All There (and) The Power of Media by Glen Mehn

This Sherlock is hanging out with some very interesting people - Andy Warhol's hangers-on, to be exact, and their drug-dealer, Dr John 'Doc' Watson.
But Sherlock is bored - and decides to find some cases to occupy his time.
Half There/All There (and) The Power of Media by Glen Mehn
This Sherlock is hanging out with some very interesting people - Andy Warhol's hangers-on, to be exact, and their drug-dealer, Dr John 'Doc' Watson.
But Sherlock is bored - and decides to find some cases to occupy his time.
Best bits:
A Scandal in Hobohemia (and) The Case of the Tattooed Bride by Jamie Wyman
I really loved the romance between Jim Walker (this story's John Watson,) and Mrs Hudson - it was sweet but not overly, and gave a nice sub-plot to the whole thing.
I also liked that Jim was a black man in 1930s America - along with all the prejudice that comes with that, despite being a wounded war veteran.
Jim's the narrator here, and never lets himself be pigeon-holed as a victim.
I also love the careful balance of the PTSD elements - a realistic struggle, but not something which overwhelms Jim's whole life.
The 1930s circus/carnival (not entirely sure which,) setting gave it all a slightly Carnevale (UK - US) vibe, which I kind of loved.
I really loved the romance between Jim Walker (this story's John Watson,) and Mrs Hudson - it was sweet but not overly, and gave a nice sub-plot to the whole thing.
I also liked that Jim was a black man in 1930s America - along with all the prejudice that comes with that, despite being a wounded war veteran.
Jim's the narrator here, and never lets himself be pigeon-holed as a victim.
I also love the careful balance of the PTSD elements - a realistic struggle, but not something which overwhelms Jim's whole life.
The 1930s circus/carnival (not entirely sure which,) setting gave it all a slightly Carnevale (UK - US) vibe, which I kind of loved.
All the Single Ladies (and) A Study in Starlets by Gini Koch
I think this was the scenario where Sherlock seemed most like Sherlock - despite being a woman instead of the traditional male role.
She's clever, cutting, but also occasionally playful.
She has a strong edge to her which just spoke totally of Sherlock Holmes to me - determined and non-nonsense; as far as I'm concerned she rocks.
I liked the part-showbiz setting, and the title of 'A Study in Starlets,' is just fantastic ;)
I think this was the scenario where Sherlock seemed most like Sherlock - despite being a woman instead of the traditional male role.
She's clever, cutting, but also occasionally playful.
She has a strong edge to her which just spoke totally of Sherlock Holmes to me - determined and non-nonsense; as far as I'm concerned she rocks.
I liked the part-showbiz setting, and the title of 'A Study in Starlets,' is just fantastic ;)
Half There/All There (and) The Power of Media by Glen Mehn
I really liked the prose here in particular - it was incredibly well-written and was quite beautiful in places.
I also loved the Holmes/Watson relationship dynamic here - totally made sense, and was believable and sweet t'boot :)
Plus there was always the sense that everything interweaved with everything else in this one, even if not directly, which gave it a really unique vibe.
Hard to explain it really, but I liked it, whatever it was.
I liked that this novella tried to deal with the racial tensions, and the issues faced by LGBTQ+ people in the 1960s - unfortunately it maybe didn't always get the balance right.
Not so great bits:
There's various instances of violence and swearing throughout the collection, which won't be to everyone's taste.
A Scandal in Hobohemia (and) The Case of the Tattooed Bride by Jamie Wyman
There were moments when I felt that things just didn't quite gel together with this take on Holmes.
I'm not sure why exactly - maybe it was just trying to achieve too much in too short a time, but this made it seem a little jumpy and incoherent in places.
Also, it kept switching from a circus to a carnival, and I'm like: which is it?!
I felt like maybe we could've done with a stronger show of Sanford (this version's Sherlock,) or 'Crash,' and his general character.
He didn't seem all that detailed, character-wise, and, to me at least, I would've liked some more depth.
That's a personal thing though, and I think a lot of people will be happy enough with Wyman's portrayal.
There were moments when I felt that things just didn't quite gel together with this take on Holmes.
I'm not sure why exactly - maybe it was just trying to achieve too much in too short a time, but this made it seem a little jumpy and incoherent in places.
Also, it kept switching from a circus to a carnival, and I'm like: which is it?!
I felt like maybe we could've done with a stronger show of Sanford (this version's Sherlock,) or 'Crash,' and his general character.
He didn't seem all that detailed, character-wise, and, to me at least, I would've liked some more depth.
That's a personal thing though, and I think a lot of people will be happy enough with Wyman's portrayal.
All the Single Ladies (and) A Study in Starlets by Gini Koch
There were moments here where the prose seemed to drag a bit. It wasn't too bad, but it did slow me down in places.
Largely speaking it zipped along, there was just the odd moment where the prose slowed down a little too much for my liking.
Also, occasionally Sherlock acts like a bit of a douche - but then, the character always has been a bit of a douche. (In the best possible way.)
Half There/All There (and) The Power of Media by Glen Mehn
I wasn't too thrilled by all the casual-drug-taking here. In places, it felt like it was a little too normalised, and that's not great. *Shrugs.*
I was also a little confused by the 1960s references in places - I'm not from New York in the '60s, you may have to explain a little more. Just saying.
Also, if the author could've dialogue-tagged the speech a little more? Explained who was talking and when? That would've been great.
I did feel a little uncomfortable with the way some of the racial and LGBTQ+ issues were dealt with.
Referring to LGBTQ+ people as 'homos,' for example, may be historically accurate (i.e. for the 1960s,) but it doesn't feel right to a 21st Century mind-frame.
It's highly uncomfortable - at best.
Verdict:
I was also a little confused by the 1960s references in places - I'm not from New York in the '60s, you may have to explain a little more. Just saying.
Also, if the author could've dialogue-tagged the speech a little more? Explained who was talking and when? That would've been great.
I did feel a little uncomfortable with the way some of the racial and LGBTQ+ issues were dealt with.
Referring to LGBTQ+ people as 'homos,' for example, may be historically accurate (i.e. for the 1960s,) but it doesn't feel right to a 21st Century mind-frame.
It's highly uncomfortable - at best.
Verdict:
I really enjoyed this collection overall.
Each one of the interpretations somehow managed to bring a freshness to a story that's been told time and time again (and very well at that.)
Sure, there were hiccups here and there, but largely speaking? An enjoyable read.
Each one of the interpretations somehow managed to bring a freshness to a story that's been told time and time again (and very well at that.)
Sure, there were hiccups here and there, but largely speaking? An enjoyable read.
Liked
this post? Try these:
- Reviewing the Evidence Time Again, My Friends - The Telling Error by Sophie Hannah
- Review! (Woo!) - World Gone By by Dennis Lehane
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)












